Evaluations & Procedure Training
“Success has to do with deliberate practice. Practice must be focused, determined, and in an environment where there is feedback.” -Malcolm Gladwell
Practice doesn’t make perfect, practice makes permanent. That is why deliberate practice, in which feedback on performance is used to guide improvement, is so important. Having robust assessment systems that are focused on learner improvement are key to developing mastery. This is the over-arching philosophy of our assessment and procedure training systems.
At UC you will benefit from one of the most robust GME assessment and feedback systems in the world.1-5 Residents receive assessments from multiple sources - attendings, peers, nurses, other allied health professionals, and students. Our focus is on using assessment data for formative purposes (assessment FOR learning) rather than only using it for summative purposes (assessment OF learning). Our residents meet with program leadership to review their data, set goals, and develop personalized improvement plans to become the best physician possible.
It has become clear that "see one, do one, teach one" is a flawed approach to procedure training that is not optimal for patients or trainees.6,7 Therefore, we have begun developing systems of procedure training based on sound procedural and assessment principles.8 We ensure that our residents meet the ACGME procedure requirements, while striving to be flexible and meet each resident’s individual procedural training needs.
- There are simulation labs at both the College of Medicine, VA Medical Center, and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center where the residents are provided with many opportunities to learn.
- Residents have opportunities to perform procedures on numerous inpatient rotations (general wards, CVICU, MICU, PICU, NICU, ED) as well as in Med-Peds clinic.
- Focused procedural experiences include procedure shifts in the Pediatric ED, an advanced MICU elective, and a point of care ultrasound (POCUS) elective.
- Warm EJ. Observable Practice Activity Assessment System https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5JVRZrXBbU&spfreload=102014.
- Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD, et al. Entrustment and mapping of observable practice activities for resident assessment. Journal of general internal medicine. 2014;29(8):1177-1182.
- Warm EJ, Held J, Hellman M, et al. Entrusting Observable Practice Activities and Milestones Over the 36 Months of an Internal Medicine Residency. Academic Medicine. 2016;91(10):1398-1405.
- Kinnear B, Bensman R, Held J, O'Toole J, Schauer D, Warm E. Critical Deficiency Ratings in Milestone Assessment: A Review and Case Study. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2017;92(6):820-826.
- Warm EJ, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D. Feedback on Feedback as a Faculty Development Tool. Journal of graduate medical education. 2018;In press.
- Sawyer T, White M, Zaveri P, et al. Learn, see, practice, prove, do, maintain: an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2015;90(8):1025-1033.
- Wigger G, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, O'Toole J, Warm EJ, Sall D. Paracentesis Simulation: A Comprehensive Approach to Procedural Education. Accepted for publication and in press for MedEdPORTAL, July 2018.
- Sall D, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Warm EJ, O'Toole J. A Single Method of Assessment is Not Enough: Development, Pilot Testing and Validity Evidence for a Novel Paracentesis Competency Assessment Tool. Under revision.